Lightspeed Grants
USD 5,000,000 maximum; see notes for structure · Lightcone Infrastructure (primary funder for its round was Jaan Tallinn)
A fast, low-friction grants program run by Lightcone Infrastructure that funds projects improving humanity's long-term future (AI existential risk, biosecurity, improving decision-making). Uses an S-Process-style evaluation and welcomes grant requests of any size, with an optional expedited 'venture grants' track. Current status: closed; The checked site describes the 2023 round and does not publish a current application window. Award economics: USD 5,000,000 maximum; dilution/equity: none.
Tier 2 · ranked #42AI-safetyexistential-riskfast-grantsbiosecurity
ApplyOfficial siteOpen in the live directory
Key facts
| Funder | Lightcone Infrastructure (primary funder for its round was Jaan Tallinn) |
| Amount | USD 5,000,000 maximum; see notes for structure |
| Decision time | Evaluators estimate value at different funding levels; funders inspect reasoning and allocations are optimized before funders can adjust or withdraw. |
| Eligibility | Projects capable of substantially improving humanity's long-run trajectory; priority areas include AI existential risk, novel pathogens, decision-maker reasoning and crucial considerations, while out-of-scope projects were still welcome. |
| Restrictions | Award-specific; public site emphasizes allocation and applicant experience but does not publish a universal reporting schedule. Dilution/equity: none. |
| Status | closed |
Always confirm on the official page before applying — dates and terms change.
Application process
- Submit project and funding-level request during an open round
- Independent evaluators score value at multiple funding levels
- Funders review evaluator reasoning
- Allocation mechanism proposes a funding distribution
- Funders adjust commitments before final grants
Background
Lightcone Infrastructure (primary funder for its round was Jaan Tallinn) operates Lightspeed Grants. The official-source pass separates the currently actionable opportunity from historical cohorts and separates per-recipient value from headline program envelopes. Lightcone Infrastructure says it has experience with Survival and Flourishing Fund and Long-Term Future Fund grantmaking.
How the application really works
Submit project and funding-level request during an open round → Independent evaluators score value at multiple funding levels → Funders review evaluator reasoning → Allocation mechanism proposes a funding distribution → Funders adjust commitments before final grants
Tips
- Demonstrate: Large expected effect on humanity's long-run future
- Demonstrate: Strong case for marginal value at multiple funding levels
- Demonstrate: Work in existential-risk or high-leverage decision areas
Watch out for
- Current status is closed; do not use an archived form.
- Dilution/equity treatment: none.
- Award-specific; public site emphasizes allocation and applicant experience but does not publish a universal reporting schedule.
Track record
- Lightcone Infrastructure says it has experience with Survival and Flourishing Fund and Long-Term Future Fund grantmaking.
No award/application count on the current official page.
Frequently asked questions
- Is this opportunity actionable now?
- closed. The checked site describes the 2023 round and does not publish a current application window.
- What is the real per-recipient economic value?
- USD 5,000,000 maximum. Award minimum: 5000. Dilution/equity: none.
- Which jurisdictions and applicants are eligible?
- Projects capable of substantially improving humanity's long-run trajectory; priority areas include AI existential risk, novel pathogens, decision-maker reasoning and crucial considerations, while out-of-scope projects were still welcome.
- How does selection work?
- Submit project and funding-level request during an open round; Independent evaluators score value at multiple funding levels; Funders review evaluator reasoning; Allocation mechanism proposes a funding distribution; Funders adjust commitments before final grants. Evaluators estimate value at different funding levels; funders inspect reasoning and allocations are optimized before funders can adjust or withdraw.
- What appears to win?
- Large expected effect on humanity's long-run future; Strong case for marginal value at multiple funding levels; Work in existential-risk or high-leverage decision areas
- What burden or follow-on should I expect?
- Award-specific; public site emphasizes allocation and applicant experience but does not publish a universal reporting schedule. No recurring cycle or automatic follow-on published.
Related grants
Sources
- lightspeedgrants.org — Official priorities, process, funder and contact (checked 2026-08-10)